13th-century canon law manuscript containing the 'Decretum' of Gratian, with glosses to the text only in select places. Ker has dated the manuscript to the first half of the 13th century. The main body of text is written in littera textualis in double columns of 50 to 51 lines each, with spaces left for glosses in two columns.

Borland suggests that the manuscript was possibly executed in France based on the illumination. Dolezalek believes the manuscript can be attributed to Britain due to the decoration, the compass pricks along the inner margins, and the occasional use of the British shorthand for "et" in the text and glosses.

The division of the 'decretum' is as follows:

Gratian, 'Concordia discordantium canonum ac primum de jure naturae et constitutionis', in 101 distinctions. Folios 1r-59r.

Gratian, 'Causae'. Incomplete, lacking 'Causae' 8-11 and 17-21. Folios 59v-198v.

Gratian, 'De consacratione'. Folios 198v-217v.

The manuscript is not complete. Several of the 'Causae' are wanting and three folios have been lost. Glosses to the text are infrequent, and can be found in 'Distinctiones' 53-54, from 'Distinctiones' 82 to 'Causa 1, Questio 2', and in parts of 'Causae' 11, 12, 16, and 20. Dolezalek has established that the glosses refer to the main text by means of signs in red ink consisting of dashes, commas, dots, and circles. Most of the glosses offer explanations to the text, and only very few glosses make cross references to other works. There are several quotations on folio 59v which make reference to the 'Decretals' of Gregory IX. Authors of the glosses are rarely mentioned, however, Dolezalek has identified some which end with a siglum 'jo.', which probably refers to the gloss of Johannes Teutonicus Zemeke. Dolezalek has collated the glosses with the 1585 printed edition of Gratian's 'Decretum'. He concludes that the collated glosses match but that the printed edition contains many more glosses than the manuscript.

In addition to the glosses there are freuqent marginal annotations and notes in contemporary and later hands. Many of these annotations have, however, been erased. Pentrials in a darker ink are also present in the margins of folios throughout the volume.

Litterae notabiliores are given in red and blue with red and blue penwork, often extending into the margins. Guide letters are occasionally present for the larger initials. Smaller initials are stroked with red. The rubrics and chapter titles are red.

Chapter headings in upper margin are in red and blue, with guide letters for this occasionally visible in the outer margin, though often cropped. The chapter and divisional numeration is in red and blue Roman numerals in the margins, and occasionally also in Arabic numerals in plain ink, although many of these have been erased.

There are illuminated initials at beginning of the 'distinctio' and throughout the 'casuae'. These are executed in colour and conventionally floriated, with various forms of spirals ending in buds, volutes, grotesques, and animal forms. The backgrounds are of burnished gold and the colours, mostly blue and lake, are relieved by white tracery. The whole of the first word or phrase is illuminated alongside its initial, the letters are burnished gold with inlays of lake or white upon grounds of blue or lake.

Illuminated initials are on the following folios: 1r, 59v, 74r, 81v, 83r, 84v, 87r, 95v, 105r, 107r, 109v, 117r, 119r, 121r, 122r, 124r, 127r, 149r, 154v, 161r, 162r, 164r, 164v, 170v, 192v, 193r, 197v, 198v. The illuminated initial on folio 198v has been cut out.

There are marginal and interlineal additions and annotations, some of which are scribal, as well as maniculae and faces.

A horizontal catchword is visible on folio 159v.

Quire signatures, given as lower case letters, are occasionally visible in the centre of the lower margin. Many of these have been rubbed out or cropped.

The following folios are half-leaves, the lower margin being cut away: 68, 90, 124, 143, 144, 147, 174, 177, 189.

There are contemporary repairs throughout. Each folio, recto and verso, has been lined and ruled in red. Pricking is evident consistently on the inner margin, and less consistently on the three remaining margins.